MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019050182 · doi:10.1139/g99-142

Organization, nucleotide sequence, and chromosomal mapping of a tandemly repeated unit containing the four core histone genes and a 5S rRNA gene in an isopod crustacean species

2000· article· en· W2019050182 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rita Barzotti, Franca Pelliccia, Elisabetta Bucciarelli, Angela Rocchi

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneGeneticsGene clusterRepeated sequencePloidyFluorescence in situ hybridizationChromosomeMolecular biologyGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A tandemly repeated unit of 6553 bp containing a copy of the four core histone genes H2B, H2A, H3, and H4, and also a 5S rRNA gene, was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of the isopod crustacean Asellus aquaticus. The linkage between 5S rRNA genes and histone genes has been so far observed in only one other organism, the anostrac crustacean Artemia salina. The gene cluster was cloned and sequenced. The histone genes, in their 3' flanking region, have the interesting feature of possessing two different mRNA termination signals, the stem-loop structure and the AATAAA sequence. A part of the PCR product was used as a probe in FISH experiments to locate the gene cluster on an inter-individually variable number of chromosomes from 6 to 12 per diploid cell, always in a terminal position and never associated with the heterochromatic areas. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was also performed on preparations of released chromatin and the reiteration level of the gene cluster was determined as approximately 200-300 copies per haploid genome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207