Synthesis and characterization of a series of 3-methyl-3-{3-[1-methyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]propyl}-1-aryl-1-triazenes and related compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of diazonium salts has been coupled to both secondary nitrogen atoms of the bis-secondary amine, N,N′-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine (MeNHCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 NHMe), to afford the new bistriazene series, the 3-methyl-3-{3-[1-methyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]propyl}-1-aryl-1-triazenes (9). These compounds have been fully characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopy, with supporting data from elemental analysis and high-resolution mass spectrometry. A limited number of model compounds in the N,N-dimethyl-N-{3-[1-methyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]propyl}amine series (10) have been synthesized to aid in the interpretation of the NMR spectra of the bistriazenes (9). A series of related compounds, the 3-ethyl-3-{(E)-4-[1-ethyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]-2-butenyl}-1-aryl-1-triazenes (11), have been synthesized by diazonium coupling with the bis-secondary amine N,N′-diethyl-2-butene-1,4-diamine (15), and the diazonium coupling reaction with trans-N,N′-dimethycyclohexane-1,2-diamine (19) has been used to prepare another related series of bistriazenes, the 3-methyl-3-{2-[1-methyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]cyclohexyl}-1-aryl-1-triazenes (12). The 1 H NMR spectra of these compounds are complex because of the presence of two chiral centres in the cyclohexanediamine moiety; the diastereotopic protons of the methylene groups in the cyclohexane ring are clearly distinguished in the 500 MHz spectra of these compounds.Key words: triazene, bistriazene, synthesis, nuclear magnetic resonance, propanediamine, 1,4-diamino-2-butene, cyclohexanediamine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".