Synthesis and characterization of a series of 3-methyl-3-{3-[1-methyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]propyl}-1-aryl-1-triazenes and related compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of diazonium salts has been coupled to both secondary nitrogen atoms of the bis-secondary amine, N,N′-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine (MeNHCH2CH2CH2NHMe), to afford the new bistriazene series, the 3-methyl-3-{3-[1-methyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]propyl}-1-aryl-1-triazenes (9). These compounds have been fully characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopy, with supporting data from elemental analysis and high-resolution mass spectrometry. A limited number of model compounds in the N,N-dimethyl-N-{3-[1-methyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]propyl}amine series (10) have been synthesized to aid in the interpretation of the NMR spectra of the bistriazenes (9). A series of related compounds, the 3-ethyl-3-{(E)-4-[1-ethyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]-2-butenyl}-1-aryl-1-triazenes (11), have been synthesized by diazonium coupling with the bis-secondary amine N,N′-diethyl-2-butene-1,4-diamine (15), and the diazonium coupling reaction with trans-N,N′-dimethycyclohexane-1,2-diamine (19) has been used to prepare another related series of bistriazenes, the 3-methyl-3-{2-[1-methyl-3-aryl-2-triazenyl]cyclohexyl}-1-aryl-1-triazenes (12). The 1H NMR spectra of these compounds are complex because of the presence of two chiral centres in the cyclohexanediamine moiety; the diastereotopic protons of the methylene groups in the cyclohexane ring are clearly distinguished in the 500 MHz spectra of these compounds.Key words: triazene, bistriazene, synthesis, nuclear magnetic resonance, propanediamine, 1,4-diamino-2-butene, cyclohexanediamine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".