MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019144108 · doi:10.2118/112368-ms

Tar Sands Drilling Waste Management: A Clean Solution

2008· article· en· W2019144108 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher William Nilsen, K. McCosh, Mukesh Kapila

Bibliographic record

VenueAll Days · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsAsphaltDrilling fluidDrillingtar (computing)Waste managementSteam-assisted gravity drainagePetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceEnvironmentally friendlyGeologyMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tar sands are a combination of sand, clay, water and bitumen. In-situ techniques using steam and/or solvents are used to reduce the bitumen viscosity such that it can be recovered and refined into petroleum products. Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is an increasingly common technique which involves drilling two horizontal wells into the tar sand deposits. Steam and hot water are injected into the upper well to reduce the viscosity of the bitumen, which will drain into the lower well where it can be pumped to the surface. The waste generated from drilling these wells is extracted from the drilling fluid by shakers and includes sand contaminated with bitumen and drilling fluid. Treatment of this waste stream is challenging and typically these sands are stored at the rig site or transported for disposal at centralized sites. This paper presents novel technology for treatment of the tar sands drilling waste generated from SAGD and other tar sands drilling operations. The continuous treatment process is based on hot water addition, mixing and separation techniques to reduce the viscosity and specific gravity of the bitumen to separate it from the sand. Treatment of cuttings with light to heavy bitumen contamination and varying quantities of fine sand and clay particles has shown this treatment method to be a simple and effective means of producing clean sand and recovering the bitumen component. The energy used to heat the circulating water is recycled to minimize waste and maximize energy efficiency. The cleaned sand can be blended with natural soil and safely disposed in the environment. The recovered bitumen can be used as feedstock for further processing and refining. With the total recoverable tar sand reserves in Canada and Venezuela estimated at 300 billion barrels, the market demand for this technology is potentially immense. Effective treatment of the tar sands cuttings will convert the waste into a valuable revenue stream in an environmentally responsible manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAll DaysSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207