Long‐term survival of neonatal porcine Sertoli cells in non‐immunosuppressed rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sertoli cells from the testis contain immunoprotective properties which allow them to survive as allografts and also to protect islets and adrenal chromafin cells from immune rejection without the use of immunosuppressive drugs. Experiments were designed to determine whether xenogeneic neonatal porcine Sertoli cells (NPSCs) survive transplantation in rats without the use of immunosuppression. NPSCs (92.2 +/- 5.1%) were isolated, cultured and then transplanted under the kidney capsule of non-immunosuppressed Lewis rats. To assess survival, grafts were removed after 4, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 90 days post-transplant and immunostained for the Sertoli cell marker vimentin. Survival was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the porcine mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II (COII) subunit gene, a marker for porcine tissue. In both methods, NPSCs were detected in the grafts for at least 90 days. Histologically, NPSCs were clustered in small aggregates or organized in tubule-like structures. When stained for the presence of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), many Sertoli cells stained positive at 20 days post-transplant, indicating not only cell survival but also Sertoli cell proliferation. The number of PCNA positive cells decreased somewhat by 40 days with almost no positive Sertoli cells at 60 and 90 days. These data demonstrate that NPSCs survive long-term following xenotransplantation in rats, which to our knowledge is the first report of a discordant xenograft surviving without immunosuppression in a non-immunoprivileged site. Further study of the mechanism of NPSC xenograft survival may provide clues for promoting a local tolerogenic environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".