MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019177969 · doi:10.1115/icmm2005-75019

Local Heat Transfer Measurements in Micro Geometries Using Liquid Crystal Thermography

2005· article· en· W2019177969 on OpenAlexaff
R. Muwanga, Ibrahim Hassan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermographyMaterials scienceHeat transferTemperature measurementHeat transfer fluidOpticsMechanicsThermodynamicsInfraredPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A technique is described on the use of un-encapsulated thermochromic liquid crystals (TLC’s) to measure the local heat transfer coefficient in microchannel geometries. Microchannel heat transfer is at the heart of the microchannel heat sink, a recent technology aimed at managing the stringent thermal requirements of today’s high-end electronics. The microencapsulated form of liquid crystals are well established for use in surface temperature mapping. Limited studies however are available on the use of the un-encapsulated form. This form is advantageous as it offers the potential for high spatial resolution which is necessary for micro geometries. The evaluation of this method and its associated difficulties is therefore the motivation for the experimental facility developed and described in the present work. Measurements are made in a closed loop facility combined with a microscopic imaging system and automated data acquisition. Results are presented for a circular tube made of stainless steel with an inner diameter of 1.0668mm. A localized TLC calibration is used to account for non-uniformities in the coating and variation of lighting conditions. Results for single-phase, thermally developing, laminar and turbulent flows using distilled water are presented. The results show that the correlations for conventional size channels are adequate for predicting the heat transfer characteristics of a nominally sized 1 mm channel.© 2005 ASME

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207