MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2019198134 · doi:10.2118/149711-ms

Environmental Baseline Research in the Canadian Beaufort Sea

2011· article· en· W2019198134 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cynthia D. Pyć, Martin Fortier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsArcticNet
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticBaseline (sea)CoringEnvironmental scienceOceanographySea iceMarine geologyDrillingEnvironmental resource managementGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It is generally understood that hydrocarbon exploration in the circumpolar Arctic will increase in the coming years to meet growing global energy demands. Concurrent with consumer demand is an equally important obligation to demonstrate adequate environmental understanding and risk-based operations planning prior to conducting responsible exploration and development. This is particularly the case in sensitive, extreme and remote environments like the Arctic. To demonstrate environmental knowledge and inform project planning and equipment selection early in the exploration drilling phase, BP Exploration in Canada collected environmental, geotechnical and geochemical data in the southern Beaufort Sea over two field seasons in 2010 and 2011. The research was conducted as part of the ongoing research effort of ArcticNet; an independent academic network of Canadian and foreign university and government scientists. From the Canadian research icebreaker CCGS Amundsen, a multi-disciplinary team of academic researchers and industry experts collected data on ocean circulation, chemistry and productivity; zooplankton, ichthyoplankton and benthos distribution, diversity and abundance; baseline contaminant levels in sediment and water; surface meteorology; ice properties and concentration; and marine mammal presence and movement. In addition, a significant geotechnical, geohazards and geochemical survey was completed using the hull-mounted sonars and coring equipment of the vessel. The large amount of information collected is already informing operational plans related to drilling equipment, drilling design and environmental impact assessment. Key technical input includes ice-loads related to bearing capacity of drill systems; and sediment strength measurements input to anchoring and casing design. Geochemical analysis of piston cores collected during the field program has provided insights into the petroleum system of the area. Multibeam echosounder, high-resolution images of the sea floor are providing the accurate geohazards identification and understanding critical to safe well placement and design. This paper describes how environmental data was obtained through industry-academia collaboration over two field seasons and how the data may input into oil spill trajectory modeling, cutting disposal modeling, environmental impact assessment, as well as mitigation and monitoring strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.012
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→