MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019209892 · doi:10.1086/520598

Recombinant Human Activated Protein C for the Postexposure Treatment of Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever

2007· article· en· W2019209892 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lisa E. Hensley, Edward L. Stevens, S. Betty Yan, Joan B. Geisbert, William L. Macias, Thomas Larsen, Kathleen M. Daddario-DiCaprio, Gail H. Cassell, Peter B. Jahrling, Thomas W. Geisbert

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. ArmyPublic Health Agency of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthPublic Health Agency
KeywordsRecombinant DNAEbola virusVirologyMedicineImmunologyChemistryOutbreakBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background.Infection of primates with Zaire ebolavirus (ZEBOV) leads to hypotension, coagulation disorders, and an impaired immune response and, in many ways, resembles severe sepsis.Rapid decreases in plasma levels of protein C are a prominent feature of severe sepsis and ZEBOV hemorrhagic fever (ZHF).Currently, recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC [Xigris; Eli Lilly]) is licensed for treating human patients with severe sepsis who are at high risk of death.The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of rhAPC as a potential treatment for ZHF. Methods.Fourteen rhesus macaques were challenged with a uniformly lethal dose of ZEBOV; 11 of these monkeys were treated by intravenous infusion with rhAPC beginning 30-60 min after challenge and continuing for 7 days.Three control monkeys received sterile saline in parallel. Results.All 3 control monkeys died on day 8, whereas 2 of the 11 rhAPC-treated monkeys survived.The mean time to death for the rhAPC-treated monkeys that did not survive ZEBOV challenge was 12.6 days.The difference in survival was significant when the rhAPC-treated monkeys were compared with historical controls. Conclusions.The experimental findings provide evidence that ZHF and severe sepsis share underlying mechanisms and may respond to the same therapies.The filoviruses, Ebola virus (EBOV) and Marburg virus (MARV), represent an enigmatic family of viruses that cause severe and often lethal hemorrhagic fever [1-3].Currently, there are no vaccines or postexposure treatment modalities available for preventing or managing filoviral infections.There have been a number of attempts in clinical settings to improve the status of infected patients, and several strategies have been developed and tested in vitro and in animal models (reviewed in [4,5]).Potential conflicts of interest: S.B.Y, W.L.M., and G.H.C. are employees of Lilly Research Laboratories, which holds a license for using recombinant human activated protein C for treating human cases of severe sepsis at high risk of death.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchFrench-language works237,207