MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019220432 · doi:10.1093/pasj/59.sp2.s411

Near-Infrared and Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy with the Infrared Camera (IRC) for AKARI

2007· article· en· W2019220432 on OpenAlexaff
Youichi Ohyama, Takashi Onaka, Hideo Matsuhara, Takehiko Wada, Woojung Kim, Naofumi Fujishiro, Kazunori Uemizu, Itsuki Sakon, Martin Cohen, Miho N. Ishigaki, Daisuke Ishihara, Yoshifusa Ita, Hirokazu Kataza, Toshio Matsumoto, Hiroshi Murakami, Shinki Oyabu, Toshihiko Tanabé, Toshinobu Takagi, Munetaka Ueno, Hidenori Watarai, Chris Pearson, Norihide Takeyama, Tomoyasu Yamamuro, Yuji Ikeda

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsInfraredSpectrographOpticsSpectroscopySatelliteSpectral resolutionInfrared spectroscopyRemote sensingAstronomySpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Infrared Camera (IRC) is one of the two instruments on board the AKARI satellite, In addition to deep imaging from 1.8 to 26.5 $\mu$m for the pointed observation mode of the AKARI, it has a spectroscopic capability in its spectral range. By replacing the imaging filters by transmission-type dispersers on the filter wheels, it provides low-resolution ($\lambda$/$\delta \lambda \sim$ 20–120) spectroscopy with slits, or in a wide imaging field-of-view (approximately 10$\;\times\;$10). The IRC spectroscopic mode is unique for space infrared missions in that it has the capability to perform sensitive wide-field spectroscopic surveys in the near-and mid-infrared wavelength ranges. This paper describes the specifications of the IRC spectrograph and its in-orbit performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of JapanSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207