Tectonometamorphic evolution of the Acatlan Complex eclogites (southern Mexico)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Acatlan Complex of southern Mexico is linked to the evolution of the AppalachianCaledonian chains and records events related to the Taconian, Acadian, and Alleghanian orogenies of northeastern North America. Mafic eclogites and garnet amphibolites from two selected localities are used to partially reconstruct the tectonometamorphic evolution of this complex. Eclogites contain garnet (almandine) + CaNa pyroxene + phengitic mica + zoisiteclinozoisite + quartz ± CaNa amphibole (barroisite, katophorite) ± albitic plagioclase ± rutile. Phase and textural relationships, thermobarometric determinations, and available radiometric ages indicate that eclogite-facies metamorphism took place during the Ordovician at temperatures around 560 ± 60°C and pressures between 11 and 15 kbar (1 kbar = 100 MPa). Eclogites underwent widespread retrogression to epidote-amphibolite then greenschist facies during exhumation, most probably during Devonian times. Epidoteamphibolite facies include the critical assemblage calcic pyroxene + calcic amphibole (magnesiohornblende and pargasite) + muscovite + garnet + plagioclase + epidote ± quartz, whereas greenschist facies is defined by the assemblage actinolite + albitic plagioclase + epidote + chlorite. Thermobarometric data suggest that retrogression occurred at temperatures between 510 ± 20°C and 300 ± 25°C and pressures ranging from 6 to 3.5 kbar. The obtained PT (pressuretemperature) path suggest that the Acatlan Complex evolved in a more complex continental collisional setting, including intraoceanic arcs, than shown in previously proposed models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".