MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019253429 · doi:10.1093/ajh/hpu122

Refined Assessment of Blood Pressure Instability After Spinal Cord Injury

2014· article· en· W2019253429 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hypertension · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineAutonomic dysreflexiaBlood pressureSpinal cord injuryAmbulatory blood pressureInternal medicineAmbulatoryCardiologyHeart rateDiastoleAnesthesiaPhysical therapySpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: This study determined whether the Autonomic Dysfunction Following Spinal Cord Injury (ADFSCI) questionnaire, a measure of self-reported frequency and severity of symptoms during hypo- and hypertensive episodes, correlates with blood pressure (BP) instability. In addition, test-retest reliability of the ADFSCI questionnaire was assessed. METHODS: Thirty individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) (aged 42±12 years; level of lesion = C3-L1; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale = A-C; lesion duration = 1 month to 30 years after injury) participated in this study. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was used to assess BP instability. ABPM recorded systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and heart rate at 15-minute intervals during the daytime and 1-hour intervals during the nighttime. Test-retest reliability was performed by completion of the ADFSCI questionnaire on 2 occasions (i.e., 9±4 days in between). RESULTS: Individuals with SCI who self-reported autonomic dysreflexia (AD) episodes showed significantly higher SBP coefficient of variation (CV) (14%) and more AD events (n = 11) than individuals who reported never having AD symptoms (CV = 9%; AD events = 1). Both the number of AD events over the 24-hour period and the BP variability (SBP CV) were significantly related to the patients' self-reported total AD score (rho = 0.522, P = 0.005; rho = 0.584, P = 0.001, respectively) and daily AD frequency (rho = 0.553, P = 0.003; rho = 0.586, P = 0.001, respectively). Conversely, no significant correlations existed between the number of hypotensive events over the 24-hour period and self-reported frequency and severity in the ADFSCI questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that ABPM offers a strong clinical basis for documenting and understanding BP instability, such as AD, and related symptoms in individuals with SCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it