Experimental studies on relationships between the electron work function, adhesion, and friction for 3d transition metals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental studies on the relationships between the electron work function (EWF), adhesion and friction for 3d transition metals were reported. EWF was measured using a scanning Kelvin probe. Adhesion and friction under light loads between a silicon nitride tip and sample surfaces were evaluated employing an atomic force microscope (AFM) that may also function as a lateral force microscope (LFM). Friction of the samples under a sharp tip at higher load levels was also measured using a microtribometer. It was demonstrated that there was strong correlation between the EWF, adhesion and friction. Higher EWF corresponded to lower adhesive force and thus to lower friction when measured under light loads using the AFM/LFM. Such a correlation stems from the fact that the measured adhesion and friction are largely attributed to the intrinsic interaction between the sample and AFM/LFM tip, which is governed by the electronic behavior reflected by the EWF. However, such a correlation became weaker when the friction was evaluated under a sharp tip at higher load levels. In this case, the friction behavior of a target metal was mainly determined by its mechanical behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it