MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Anaplastic Meningioma Arising From a Radiologically Diagnosed Arachnoid Cyst

2010· article· en· W2019320564 on OpenAlexafffund
Shelly Lwu, Yves Starreveld, Julie Branson, Arie Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of CalgaryMayo Clinic
KeywordsMedicineMeningiomaArachnoid cystRadiologyMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: We report the first example of an anaplastic meningioma arising from an intracranial arachnoid cyst and discuss the diagnostic challenges of this case, including the useful role of genetic markers. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old man presented with transient episodes of expressive dysphasia and focal motor seizures, superimposed on a 6-month history of worsening headaches and dizziness. His past history was significant for a previously drained left-sided chronic subdural hematoma and a radiologically diagnosed left middle fossa arachnoid cyst. Magnetic resonance imaging on admission showed variable wall thickening of the arachnoid cyst with mild mass effect on the left frontotemporal lobes. INTERVENTION: The patient underwent decompression of the arachnoid cyst and biopsy of the cyst wall. Histologic and immunohistochemical studies of the thickened portion initially suggested a metastatic carcinosarcoma, but fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies confirmed the diagnosis of anaplastic meningioma based on characteristic chromosomal deletions. The patient returned 2 months later with progressive disease, leading to his death 6 weeks later despite repeat surgery for tumor debulking. CONCLUSION: Malignant transformation of meningothelial elements in arachnoid cysts is an exceptionally rare complication that poses considerable diagnostic challenges. Genetic markers may be particularly helpful in such cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207