Linking microscopic guest properties to macroscopic observables in clathrate hydrates: Guest-host hydrogen bonding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations are used to compare microscopic structures and guest dynamics to macroscopic properties in structure II clathrate hydrates with cyclopentane, tetrahydrofuran (THF), 1,3-dioxolane, tetrahydropyran (THP), and p-dioxane as guests. Significant differences are observed between structural parameters and rotational dynamics for the different guests. The simulations show the formation of guest-host hydrogen bonds between the ether oxygen atoms of THF and THP and the cage water hydrogen atoms of the clathrate but the absence of similar hydrogen bonds in the clathrate hydrates of the other guests on the time scale of the calculations. This guest-host hydrogen bonding leads to the formation of Bjerrum L-defects in the clathrate water lattice where two adjacent water molecules have no covalently bonded hydrogen atom between them. Unlike Bjerrum defects of ice lattices, these guest-induced L-defects are not accompanied by the formation of a D-defect at an adjacent site in the water lattice. At the simulation temperature of 200 K, the guest-water hydrogen bonds in the THF clathrate are short lived (lifetime less than 1 ps) but in the THP they are longer lived (a minimum of 100 ps). A van't Hoff plot for the probability of defect formation in THF as a function of temperature gives an activation barrier of approximately 8.3 kJ/mol for guest-host defect formation in the THF clathrate. The consequences of the defect formation on the thermal expansivity, isothermal compressibility, dipole-dipole correlation function, and mechanical stability of the clathrate are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".