MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019346733 · doi:10.17851/2238-3824.13.0.49-69

Três artigos sobre a Acadie

2011· article· pt· W2019346733 on OpenAlex
Dilma Castelo Branco Diniz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCaligrama Revista de Estudos Românicos · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo: Este trabalho trata de três artigos do historiador francês, Émile Lauvrière, sobre a Acadie, a mais antiga colônia francesa da América do Norte, publicados na Revue de l’Amérique Latine, em 1924. Nos dois primeiros textos, o autor conta a história da colônia, desde sua criação até a expulsão definitiva dos acadianos pelos ingleses e sua dispersão em várias regiões da América. No último artigo, Lauvrière revela a existência de diversos grupos acadianos atuantes no Canadá e nos Estados Unidos e comenta sobre a situação do Canadá – país dividido entre anglófonos e francófonos – propondo uma maior integração entre os países da América Latina. De 1924 até hoje, houve grandes mudanças: os habitantes do Québec têm as mesmas oportunidades e o mesmo nível de vida que os canadenses das outras províncias, e o povo acadiano cultiva e mantém viva sua herança cultural. Palavras-chave: Acadie; Émile Lauvrière; Canadá; Estados Unidos.Résumé: Ce travail porte sur trois articles de l’historien français, Émile Lauvrière, ayant pour sujet l’Acadie, la plus ancienne colonie française de l’Amérique du Nord, publiés dans la Revue de l’Amérique Latine, en 1924. Dans les deux premiers textes, l’auteur raconte l’histoire de la colonie, depuis sa création jusqu’à l’expulsion définitive des Acadiens par les Anglais et leur dispersion dans plusieurs régions de l’Amérique. Dans le dernier article, Lauvrière révèle l’existence de divers groupes d’Acadiens actifs au Canada et aux États-Unis. Il fait également des remarques sur la situation du Canada – pays divisé entre les anglophones et les francophones – et il propose une plus grande intégration entre les pays de l’Amérique latine. De 1924 jusqu’à nos jours, de grands changements se sont opérés: les Québécois jouissent aujourd’hui des mêmes conditions de vie que les Canadiens des autres provinces et le peuple acadien cultive et garde vivant son héritage culturel.Mots-clés: Acadie; Émile Lauvrière; Canada; États-Unis.Keywords: Acadie; Émile Lauvrière; Canada; United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it