Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: Este trabalho trata de três artigos do historiador francês, Émile Lauvrière, sobre a Acadie, a mais antiga colônia francesa da América do Norte, publicados na Revue de l’Amérique Latine, em 1924. Nos dois primeiros textos, o autor conta a história da colônia, desde sua criação até a expulsão definitiva dos acadianos pelos ingleses e sua dispersão em várias regiões da América. No último artigo, Lauvrière revela a existência de diversos grupos acadianos atuantes no Canadá e nos Estados Unidos e comenta sobre a situação do Canadá – país dividido entre anglófonos e francófonos – propondo uma maior integração entre os países da América Latina. De 1924 até hoje, houve grandes mudanças: os habitantes do Québec têm as mesmas oportunidades e o mesmo nível de vida que os canadenses das outras províncias, e o povo acadiano cultiva e mantém viva sua herança cultural. Palavras-chave: Acadie; Émile Lauvrière; Canadá; Estados Unidos.Résumé: Ce travail porte sur trois articles de l’historien français, Émile Lauvrière, ayant pour sujet l’Acadie, la plus ancienne colonie française de l’Amérique du Nord, publiés dans la Revue de l’Amérique Latine, en 1924. Dans les deux premiers textes, l’auteur raconte l’histoire de la colonie, depuis sa création jusqu’à l’expulsion définitive des Acadiens par les Anglais et leur dispersion dans plusieurs régions de l’Amérique. Dans le dernier article, Lauvrière révèle l’existence de divers groupes d’Acadiens actifs au Canada et aux États-Unis. Il fait également des remarques sur la situation du Canada – pays divisé entre les anglophones et les francophones – et il propose une plus grande intégration entre les pays de l’Amérique latine. De 1924 jusqu’à nos jours, de grands changements se sont opérés: les Québécois jouissent aujourd’hui des mêmes conditions de vie que les Canadiens des autres provinces et le peuple acadien cultive et garde vivant son héritage culturel.Mots-clés: Acadie; Émile Lauvrière; Canada; États-Unis.Keywords: Acadie; Émile Lauvrière; Canada; United States.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".