Multiple and Distinct Effects of Mutations of Tyr122, Glu123, Arg324, and Arg334 Involved in Interactions between the Top Part of Second and Fourth Transmembrane Helices in Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+-ATPase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We explored, by mutational substitutions and kinetic analysis, possible roles of the four residues involved in the hydrogen-bonding or ionic interactions found in the Ca2+-bound structure of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase, Tyr(122)-Arg(324), and Glu(123)-Arg(334) at the top part of second transmembrane helix (M2) connected to the A domain and fourth transmembrane helix (M4) in the P domain. The observed substitution effects indicated that Glu(123), Arg(334), and Tyr(122) contributed to the rapid transition between the Ca2+-unbound and bound states of the unphosphorylated enzyme. Results further showed the more profound inhibitory effects of the substitutions in the M4/P domain (Arg(324) and Arg(334)) upon the isomeric transition of phosphorylated intermediate (EP) (loss of ADP sensitivity) and those in M2/A domain (Tyr(122) and Glu(123)) upon the subsequent processing and hydrolysis of EP. The observed distinct effects suggest that the interactions seen in the Ca2+-bound structure are not functionally important but indicate that Arg(334) with its positive charge and Tyr(122) with its aromatic ring are critically important for the above distinct steps. On the basis of the available structural information, the results strongly suggest that Arg(334) moves downward and forms new interactions with M2 (likely Asn(111)); it thus contributes to the inclination of the M4/P domain toward the M2/A domain, which is crucial for the appropriate gathering between the P domain and the largely rotated A domain to cause the loss of ADP sensitivity. On the other hand, Tyr(122) most likely functions in the subsequent Ca2+-releasing step to produce hydrophobic interactions at the A-P domain interface formed upon their gathering and thus to produce the Ca2+-released form of EP. During the Ca2+-transport cycle, the four residues seem to change interaction partners and thus contribute to the coordinated movements of the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".