MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019408825 · doi:10.1586/ehm.11.5

Quebec platelet disorder

2011· article· en· W2019408825 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Catherine P.M. Hayward, Georges E. Rivard

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Hematology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPathogenesisMedicineMutationGenePlateletCancer researchFibrinolysisActivator (genetics)Plasminogen activatorPlatelet disorderGeneticsImmunologyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quebec platelet disorder (QPD) is an autosomal dominant bleeding disorder associated with a unique gain-of-function defect in fibrinolysis. In the past 5 years, there have been important advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of QPD, including its genetic cause, which is a copy number variation mutation of PLAU, the gene for urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA). QPD is the first bleeding disorder identified to be caused by a PLAU mutation and it is also the first bleeding disorder recognized to result from a gene copy number mutation. The molecular defect of QPD leads to marked overexpression of uPA during megakaryopoiesis, producing profibrinolytic platelets that contain active forms of uPA in their α-granules. This article summarizes expert opinions on the features of QPD and recent advances in the understanding of its pathogenesis and genetic cause.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of HematologySame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207