MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019447640 · doi:10.2495/ut150041

Quantifying the benefits of peak spreading as a sustainable solution to addressing traffic congestion within the Al Ain private school zone in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

2015· article· en· W2019447640 on OpenAlexaff
A. Al Jassmi, M. Ochieng

Bibliographic record

VenueWIT transactions on the built environment · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransport Systems and Technology
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbu dhabiIntersection (aeronautics)Transport engineeringTraffic congestionTravel timeExternalityQueueBusinessGeographyComputer scienceEngineeringMetropolitan areaComputer networkEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Owing to the over-concentration of about 40 schools along an approximately 5km stretch of an urban street within the City of Al Ain, UAE, daily traffic experiences and motorists frustrations manifested in terms of intersection delay, travel time, queues, travel speed and emissions have reached intolerable levels.While varied efforts are being put in place to address the situation, the Department of Transport (DoT) embarked on a pilot study that involved staggering of the starting time of schools over a time interval of 30 minutes for two weeks.The main objective of the study was to examine the effect of peak spreading on minimizing roadway congestion and other externalities within the private school zone.The study was cross-sectional in nature and involved traffic data collection before the implementation of the staggered school starting times and during the scheme.This purpose of paper therefore summarizes the findings of the scheme in quantifiable attributes of intersection delays, link travel times and traffic volumes intensities; and also formed the basis for recommendations to further address traffic congestion within the private school zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIT transactions on the built environmentSame topicTransport Systems and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207