MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019456941 · doi:10.1021/pr0603811

Protein Markers of Ischemic Insult in Brain Endothelial Cells Identified Using 2D Gel Electrophoresis and ICAT-Based Quantitative Proteomics

2006· article· en· W2019456941 on OpenAlexaff
Arsalan S. Haqqani, John F. Kelly, Ewa Baumann, Reiner F. Haseloff, Ingolf E. Blasig, Danica Stanimirovic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteomicsInsultTwo-dimensional gel electrophoresisGel electrophoresisQuantitative proteomicsChemistryProtein expressionBiologyMolecular biologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is formed by endothelial cells of cerebral microvessels sealed by tight junctions. Ischemic brain injury is known to initiate a series of biochemical and molecular processes that lead to the disruption of the BBB, development of vascular inflammation, and subsequent neurovascular remodeling including angiogenesis. Molecular effectors of these changes are multiple and are regulated in a dynamic fashion. The current study was designed to analyze changes in cellular and secreted proteins in rat brain endothelial cells (BEC) exposed to ischemic insult in vitro using two complementary quantitative proteomic approaches: two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) and isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT)-based proteomics. We show a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative comparison between the two proteomic methods applied to the same experimental system with respect to their reproducibility, specificity, and the type of proteins identified. In total, >160 proteins showed differential expression in response to the ischemic insult, with 38 identified by 2DE and 138 by ICAT. Only 15 proteins were commonly identified. ICAT showed superior reproducibility over 2DE and was more suitable for detecting small, large, basic, hydrophobic, and secreted proteins than 2DE. However, positive identification of proteins by MS/MS was more reliably done using a 2DE-based method compared to ICAT. Changes in proteins involved in nucleic acid, protein, and carbohydrate metabolism, signal transduction, cell structure, adhesion and motility, immunity and defense, cell cycle, and apoptosis were observed. The functional significance of observed protein changes was evaluated through a multifaceted protein classification and validation process, which included literature mining and comparative evaluation of protein changes in analogous in vitro and in vivo ischemia models. The comparative analyses of protein changes between the in vitro and in vivo models demonstrated a significant correlative relationship, emphasizing the 'translational' value of in vitro endothelial models in neurovascular research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207