Radiation-Induced Stress Relaxation of Welded Type 304 Stainless Steel Evaluated by Neutron Diffraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The welded Type 304 stainless steel specimens were neutron-irradiated up to 2 × 1025 n/m2 (E > 1MeV) at 561K in the Japan Material Testing Reactor (JMTR). The residual stresses in the test specimens were measured by neutron diffraction, and the radiation-induced stress relaxation was evaluated from the change of stress distributions along the direction transverse to the weld bead. The magnitudes of σX (transverse to the weld) and σY (longitudinal to the weld) residual stresses decreased steadily with increasing neutron fluence. The irradiation dose dependence and the mechanism for the relaxation were examined using an equation derived from the irradiation creep equation. There was a steep stress relaxation, which might correspond to transient creep, at the early stage of neutron irradiation near the weld, and the different radiation-induced relaxation behaviors could be observed depending on the distance from the weld. The radiation-induced stress relaxation for welding-induced residual stress, which was generated under a three-dimensional restriction, indicated the tendency to be slower compared to the fundamental results for mechanically applied stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".