MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019488674 · doi:10.1021/es070522f

Brominated Flame Retardants in Glaucous Gulls from the Norwegian Arctic:  More Than Just an Issue of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers

2007· article· en· W2019488674 on OpenAlexafffund
Jonathan Verreault, Wouter A. Gebbink, Lewis T. Gauthier, Geir Wing Gabrielsen, Robert J. Letcher

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorsk PolarinstituttNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsHexabromocyclododecanePolybrominated diphenyl ethersYolkEnvironmental chemistryChemistryLarusPolychlorinated biphenylFire retardantAnimal scienceFood scienceBiologyPollutantFisheryOrganic chemistryFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several, unregulated, current-use brominated flame retardants (BFRs), including hexabromobenzene (HBB), 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)ethane (BTBPE), pentabromoethylbenzene (PBEB), pentabromotoluene (PBT), and hexabromocyclododecane (as total-(alpha)-HBCD), were examined in egg yolk and plasma of male and female glaucous gulls (Larus hyperboreus) from the Norwegian Arctic. Also examined were BDE209 and 38 tri- to nona-BDE congeners and brominated biphenyl (BB) 101. The HBB, BTBPE, PBEB, and PBT had high detection frequencies and variability in male and female plasma and egg yolk samples, and their concentrations ranged from nondetectable (< 0.02-0.27 ng/g wet wt) to 2.64 ng/g wet wt. The detection frequencies and range of concentrations of non-BDE BFRs were generally highest in plasma of males relative to females. Total-(alpha)-HBCD concentrations were highest among the non-PBDE BFRs (up to 6.12 and 63.9 ng/g wet wt in plasma and egg yolk, respectively). Next highest was HBB with concentrations within a range comparable to the minor PBDEs monitored (e.g., BDE28, 116 and 155). Sum (sigma)38PBDE concentrations ranged from 2.49 to 54.5 ng/g wet wt in plasma and 81.2 to 321 ng/g wet wt in egg yolk. The BDE209 was virtually nondetectable, whereas six octa-BDEs (i.e., BDE196, 197, 201, 202, 203, and 205), as well as three nona-BDEs (i.e., BDE206, 207, and 208, and potential BDE209 debromination products) were found sporadically in plasma and egg yolk. The results from this study suggestthat in addition to PBDEs, several current-use, non-BDE BFRs undergo long-range atmospheric transport and bioaccumulate at low levels in and are maternally transferred (to eggs) in glaucous gulls from the Norwegian Arctic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations159
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207