MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The role of conservative management of vestibular schwannomas

2000· article· en· W2019502188 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Otolaryngology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConservative managementOtorhinolaryngologyMagnetic resonance imagingSurgeryVestibular systemRadiological weaponConservative treatmentNatural historyVestibular SchwannomasMicrosurgeryRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although microsurgery is generally regarded as the conventional treatment of choice for most vestibular schwannomas, there remains a group of patients in whom a conservative management approach may be a desirable alternative. The aim of this study was to determine the natural history and outcome following the conservative management of 72 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannomas. The reasons for conservative management included poor general health, age, patient preference, small tumour size, minimal or no symptoms, and tumour in the only/better hearing ear. The mean duration of follow-up was 39.8 months (range 12-194 months). All patients underwent serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessment of tumour growth. Patients were deemed to have failed conservative management if there was evidence of continuous or rapid radiological tumour growth and/or increasing symptoms or signs. The mean tumour growth rate, according to the 1995 guidelines of the American Academy of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, was 1.16 mm/year (range: 0.75 9.65 mm/year). Approximately 83% of tumours grew at < 2 mm/year. Significant tumour growth was seen in 36.4%, no or insignificant growth in 50%, and negative growth in 13.6% of tumours. The growth rate of CPA tumours (1.4 mm/year) was significantly greater than that of IAC tumours (0.2 mm/year) (P = 0.001). Failure of conservative management, in which active treatment was required, occurred in 15.3%. The outcome of these patients appeared to be as favourable to a comparable group who underwent primary treatment, without a period of conservative management. The mean growth rate of tumours in patients who failed conservative management (4.2 mm/year) was significantly greater than that in patients who did not fail (0.5 mm/year) (P < 0.01). No factors predictive of tumour growth or failure of conservative management were identified. Deterioration of mean pure tone average (0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz) and speech discrimination scores occurred regardless of whether radiological tumour growth was demonstrated or not. This study suggests that in a select number of cases of vestibular schwannoma, a conservative management approach may be appropriate. Regular follow-up with serial MRI is mandatory. Deterioration of auditory function occurs even in the absence of tumour growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it