The Mouth Alcohol Effect After a “Mouthful” of Beer Under Social Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fifteen male and fifteen female alcohol-free subjects consumed a “mouthful” of beer (5%v/v alcohol) from a beer bottle. Intoxilyzer® 5000C tests were conducted five and ten minutes after the consumption of beer. The volume of beer consumed by the male subjects (range 26–146 mL, mean 85 mL) was significantly greater than the volume consumed by the female subjects (range 16–141 mL, mean 37 mL). The subjects were allowed to talk during the experiment to simulate social conditions. A positive breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) occurred in 13 subjects (43%) five minutes after the consumption of beer (range 0.007–0.016 g/210 L breath, mean 0.011 g/210 L). Ten minutes after the consumption of beer, the measured BrAC's in all subjects were zero. There was no apparent correlation between the BrAC and the amount of beer consumed. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C did not identify any of these low BrAC's as “mouth alcohol”. This study shows the duration of a significant mouth alcohol effect for consuming beer under social conditions is less than the usual 15–20 minutes. This decreased deprivation time may facilitate more rapid breath alcohol screening tests in the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".