MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019538411 · doi:10.1063/1.1870114

InGaAs ∕ InP quantum well intermixing studied by high-resolution x-ray diffraction and grazing incidence x-ray analysis

2005· article· en· W2019538411 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural SciencesWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceSuperlatticeIon implantationDiffractionAnnealing (glass)IndiumQuantum wellOptoelectronicsBilayerIonAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryOpticsPhysicsMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following a study of implantation enhanced interdiffusion of InGaAs∕InP multiple quantum well (MQW) structures by cross-sectional scanning tunneling microscopy (XSTM), the techniques of low temperature photoluminescence spectroscopy, high-resolution x-ray diffraction (HRXRD), and grazing incidence x-ray analysis (GIXA) are used to independently investigate the suitability of a square well model for the interdiffused MQW profiles, and the observed dependence of strain development as a function of the implanted ion range relative to the MQW stacks. In agreement with previous XSTM findings, when ions are implanted through the MQWs, HRXRD measurements indicate equivalent extents of interdiffusion occurring on both sublattices, while GIXA measurements further indicate the compositional profiles to be non-Fickian and compatible with uniformly broadened square well distributions. Following shallow ion implants (where ions are deposited between the MQWs and the sample surface), (004) HRXRD measurements indicate preferential group V interdiffusion. Dynamical simulations of the superlattice envelope in the (004) HRXRD rocking curves show the compositional profiles to be non-Fickian and compatible with a square well model for the broadened compositional profiles. Additional analysis of the (001) bilayer spacing from previously published XSTM linescan data for this structure is also consistent with this finding. Results of a preliminary photoluminescence and HRXRD investigation of disordering induced by indium implants and the effects of extended annealing on a series of MQW samples (with and without implantation) are presented. Implications for the implantation enhancement of interdiffusion in the InGaAs∕InP material system are discussed. The interpretation of quantum well interdiffusion experiments in this material system in terms of Fickian diffusion models warrants revision in light of the present findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it