The endoplasmic reticulum stress response in the pancreatic <i>β</i> ‐cell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eukaryotic cells respond to stress in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) resulting from insufficient protein folding capacity or altered ER homeostasis by activating the unfolded protein response (UPR). In mammalian cells the UPR is mediated by at least three ER-localized sensors/transducers, and the cellular response and susceptibility to ER stress is likely to be cell-type specific to some degree. Here, we review the response of pancreatic β-cells or islets to ER stress induced by pharmacological agents, misfolded insulin expression, excessive nutrient exposure and in animal models of type 2 diabetes. This review highlights the particular importance of PERK-mediated translational control and the transcriptional response in pancreatic β-cells and how these relate to the highly specialized function of β-cells, namely glucose-regulated insulin secretion and production. We examine how chronic ER stress may prematurely 'age' the β-cell or cause its genetic reprogramming to either reduce its ability to mount a cell survival response to ER stress, or impair normal function. Both could contribute to β-cell failure in diabetes. We also explore the therapeutic potential of targeting the UPR to preserve β-cell function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".