MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019552068 · doi:10.1002/jcp.10418

Enterocytin: A new specific enterocyte marker bearing a B30.2‐like domain

2003· article· en· W2019552068 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Parnis, Cendrine Nicoletti, Vincent Ollendorff, Dominique Massey‐Harroche

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDigestive system and related health
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint Jerome
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnterocyteImmunoprecipitationBiologyComplementary DNACell biologyCryptcDNA libraryMolecular biologyTransfectionSmall intestineBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enterocyte differentiation is correlated to the expression of specific proteins which only a few of them are identified. In this study, we characterize a new marker of enterocyte differentiation using monoclonal antibodies. We showed that small intestinal enterocytes specifically express a new 47 kDa protein named Enterocytin. Expression of this protein increase along the crypt-villus axis and it is concentrated in the terminal web, lateral plasma membrane domain, and nucleus membrane of mature enterocytes. A 1.8-kb cDNA of Enterocytin was isolated by expression cloning from a cDNA library of rabbit small intestine. The amino acid sequence obtained shows an N-terminal region with a coiled-coil structure and a B30.2-like domain in the C-terminus region. By co-transfection and immunoprecipitation procedures on Cos cells, it was observed that the coiled-coil domain is involved in the homodimerization of Enterocytin. In the human intestine, a similar 47 kDa protein was detected, exclusively in the small intestinal enterocytes. In addition, expression of this protein in Caco2 cells is correlated with the state of differentiation of these cells. The restricted expression of Enterocytin in the intestine and its localization in mature cells suggest that it may contribute to the differentiation processes and maintenance of the enterocytic polarity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular PhysiologySame topicDigestive system and related healthFrench-language works237,207