MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019554100 · doi:10.1116/1.1756881

Reaction intermediates in high temperature catalytic water formation studied with cavity ringdown spectroscopy

2004· article· en· W2019554100 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stina Hemdal, Albin Alm Johansson, Michael Försth, Mats R. Andersson, Arne Rosén

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVetenskapsrådetCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaPreem
KeywordsCatalysisChemistryCrystallitePlatinumHydrogenAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PalladiumSpectroscopyRotational temperatureOrganic chemistryCrystallographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rotational temperature and concentration of OH in the gas-phase outside a polycrystalline platinum catalyst has been measured using cavity ringdown spectroscopy. A mixture of H2 and O2 gases was used forming a stagnation point flow field outside the catalyst. The temperature of the catalyst was 1500 K, the total pressure in the chamber was 26 Pa, and the relative hydrogen concentration, αH2, was set to 8%. From a Boltzmann plot, the rotational temperature was determined to be 775±24 K, and the amount of OH was calculated from that temperature to be 1.5±0.2×1012 cm−3, 6.5 mm outside the catalyst. A similar experiment has also been performed using a polycrystalline palladium catalyst. However, due to lower amount of OH in the gas-phase outside the Pd catalyst, the number density could not successfully be determined. In this study we have shown that cavity ringdown spectroscopy successfully can be used to quantify desorbed intermediates within a catalytic reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and FilmsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207