Lymphadenoma: Case Report of a Rare Salivary Gland Tumor in Childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lymphadenoma of the salivary gland is a rare benign tumor with only 11 reported cases in the English language literature, most of which have occurred in adults. We report a case of a lymphadenoma occurring in the parotid gland of a 15-year-old girl. The tumor was composed of variably sized cystic cavities within abundant reactive lymphoid tissue. The cystic spaces were filled with eosinophilic secretions with occasional histiocytes. Many of these features were also apparent on cytologic preparations. The cysts were lined by epithelium lacking atypia and showed luminal and abluminal differentiation both by immunohistochemistry and by electron microscopy. Tumor cells were not cycling as determined by MIB1 immunostaining, and the tumor karyotype was normal. This is only the second case to be reported in the pediatric age group. Ultrastructural features and karyotype analysis are reported for the first time. Although this tumor is rarely encountered by pediatric pathologists, awareness of its existence is important to distinguish it from possible malignant mimics, such as lymphoepithelial carcinoma and metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma in a lymph node.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".