Movements generated by intraspinal microstimulation in the intermediate gray matter of the anesthetized, decerebrate, and spinal cat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intermediate laminae of the lumbosacral spinal cord are suggested to contain a small number of specialized neuronal circuits that form the basic elements of movement construction ("movement primitives"). Our aim was to study the properties and state dependence of these hypothesized circuits in comparison with movements elicited by direct nerve or muscle stimulation. Microwires for intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) were implanted in intermediate laminae throughout the lumbosacral enlargement. Movement vectors evoked by ISMS were compared with those evoked by stimulation through muscle and nerve electrodes in cats that were anesthetized, then decerebrated, and finally spinalized. Similar movements could be evoked under anesthesia by ISMS and nerve and muscle stimulation, and these covered the full work space of the limb. ISMS-evoked movements were associated with the actions of nearby motoneuron pools. However, after decerebration and spinalization, ISMS-evoked movements were dominated by flexion, with few extensor movements. This indicates that the outputs of neuronal networks in the intermediate laminae depend significantly on descending input and on the state of the spinal cord. Frequently, the outputs also depended on stimulus intensity. These experiments suggest that interneuronal circuits in the intermediate and ventral regions of the spinal cord overlap and their function may be to process reflex and descending activity in a flexible manner for the activation of nearby motoneuron pools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".