Na+ competes with K+ in bumetanide-sensitive transport by Malpighian tubules of<i>Rhodnius prolixus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the effects of bathing saline Na+/K+ ratio, bumetanide and hydrochlorothiazide on fluid and ion transport by serotonin-stimulated Malpighian tubules of Rhodnius prolixus. Previous pharmacological and electrophysiological studies indicate that a bumetanide-sensitive Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporter is the primary route for basolateral ion entry into the cell during fluid secretion. The goal of this study was to resolve the apparent conflict between relatively high secretion rates by tubules bathed in K+-free saline and the evidence that Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransporters described in other systems have an absolute requirement for all three ions for translocation. Our measurements of fluid secretion rate, ion fluxes and electrophysiological responses to serotonin show that fluid secretion in K+-free saline is bumetanide sensitive and hydrochlorothiazide insensitive. Dose-response curves of secretion rate versus bumetanide concentration were identical for tubules bathed in K+-free and control saline with IC50 values of 2.6 x 10(-6) mmol l(-1) and 2.9 x 10(-6) mmol l(-1), respectively. Double-reciprocal plots of K+ flux versus bathing saline K+ concentration showed that increasing Na+ concentration in the bathing fluid increased Kt but had no effect on Jmax, consistent with competitive inhibition of K+ transport by Na+. We propose that the competition between Na+ and K+ for transport by the bumetanide-sensitive transporter is part of an autonomous mechanism by which Malpighian tubules regulate haemolymph K+ concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".