Collagen crosslinked N‐telopeptides as markers for evaluating particulate osteolysis: A preliminary study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether a marker of bone resorption could be used noninvasively to diagnose and assess treatment of periprosthetic osteolysis. The crosslinked N-telopeptide marker of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption potentially has the sensitivity to detect periprosthetic osteolysis. Second-morning urine specimens were obtained from (a) seven age-matched controls, (b) eight patients who had a hip arthroplasty, hybrid implants at least 1 year after surgery, and no osteolysis, (c) 11 patients who had a hip arthroplasty and osteolysis, and (d) 10 patients who had a hip arthroplasty and with osteolysis before and after 6 weeks of oral Fosamax (alendronate) treatment. The Fosamax treatment consisted of one 10-mg dose per day for 6 weeks. Men and young women (less than 40 years old) were chosen for this study to avoid bone resorption enhanced after menopause as a possible confounder. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique for quantifying crosslinked N-telopeptides of type-I collagen was performed on all specimens. The patients with osteolysis had significantly elevated levels of N-telopeptide compared with the implant control group. In addition, levels of N-telopeptide were significantly lowered after Fosamax treatment. These findings indicate that a systemic bone-resorption marker (N-telopeptide) can be used to evaluate local particulate-induced osteolysis and its treatment. The study also provides clinical evidence that osteolysis is associated with increased osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and that this locally induced bone resorption can be suppressed by certain bisphosphonates (Fosamax). These insights have potential value in the understanding and clinical management of aseptic loosening.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".