MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019717398 · doi:10.1071/fp05268

Functional characterisation of OsAMT1.1 overexpression lines of rice, Oryza sativa

2006· article· en· W2019717398 on OpenAlexafffund
Anshuman Kumar, Brent N. Kaiser, M. Yaeesh Siddiqi, Anthony D. M. Glass

Bibliographic record

VenueFunctional Plant Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTRIUMF
KeywordsOryza sativaBiologyGenetically modified riceBotanyEffluxEcophysiologyWild typeCell cultureOryzaTransgeneHorticultureGenetically modified cropsGeneBiochemistryMutantGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In rice (Oryza sativa L.) OsAMT1.1 is the most active and / or most N-responsive gene responsible for high-affinity NH4+ transport (HATS) activity. We measured 13NH4+ influx and plant biomass in transgenic overexpression lines and two wild type cultivars of rice, Jarrah and Taipei, with one or more copies of OsAMT1.1. 13NH4+ influx was higher for the overexpression lines of Jarrah line when grown at 10 µm external NH4+ concentration, but not for the overexpression lines of Taipei. For seedlings grown at 2 mm external NH4+ concentration Jarrah lines 77-1 and 75-4 showed an increased influx; however, two overexpression lines of Taipei showed reduced influx rates. The biomasses of the transgenic lines grown at low and high external NH4+ concentrations were either reduced or showed no statistically significant differences compared with wild type lines. While 13NH4+ influx into roots of Jarrah line 75-4 grown at 10 µm external NH4+ concentration was significantly higher than in wild type, measurements of 13NH efflux revealed no differences, and thus net uptake of NH4+ was higher in this overexpression line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFunctional Plant BiologySame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207