One‐ and two‐phase isochoric heat capacity measurements of aqueous solution of nacl near the critical point of pure water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Isochoric heat capacities of H2O+NaCl solutions (0.0031 and 0.0063 mole fraction of NaCl) were measured with a high temperature and high pressure adiabatic calorimeter near the sub‐critical and near the supercritical point of pure water. Temperatures ranged from 361 to 677 K. Measurements were made at six densities, namely: 367.07 and 485.59 kg·m−3 for x = 0.0031 mol fraction of NaCl and 388.65, 560.03, 607.05, and 973.70 kg·m−3 for x = 0.0063 mol fraction of NaCl. Measurements were conducted in the two‐and one‐phase regions including near phase transition temperatures TS(ρ). The phase transition temperatures TS(ρ) and saturated isochoric heat capacity values CVX have been determined for each isochore. The uncertainty in heat capacity measurements is estimated to be 3.5% to 4.5% near the phase transition and critical points. Present and previous results of heat capacity measurements were compared with predictions from the crossover (CREOS) and Pitzer—Tanger–Hovey equations of state (PTH EOS). Our previous heat capacity measurements were found to deviate systematically from crossover‐model predictions. The present results show good agreement with the crossover model for the composition x = 0.0031 mol fraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".