A new description of the skull of<i>Dyrosaurus phosphaticus</i>(Thomas, 1893) (Mesoeucrocodylia: Dyrosauridae) from the Lower Eocene of North Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dyrosaurus phosphaticus (Thomas 1893) has been described several times, but the poor preservation and the incomplete preparation of the material left this species inadequately described. Further preparation of a specimen referred to this species now allows a complete description of the braincase and its various cranial nerves. Dyrosaurid taxonomy is mainly based on mandibular characters and the complete description of the skull of D. phosphaticus, and comparison with the other known species of the family enables enhancement of other taxonomic characters. An emended diagnosis is given for D. phosphaticus, the only known species of this genus. With this new description, new characteristics that enable comparisons with other crocodyliforms are available. The presence of a distinct anterolateral postorbital process is observed in dyrosaurs, Elosuchus, Terminonaris robusta, some Goniopholis, and, although smaller, in Sarcosuchus imperator. In the dyrosaurids D. phosphaticus and Rhabdognathus, the postorbital participates largely in the dorsal margin of the infratemporal fenestra, as in Elosuchus, S. imperator, and Thalattosuchia. The laterodorsal position of the lateral eustachian foramen in dyrosaurids is similar to those of Elosuchus and thalattosuchians. These characters are not shared by Stolokrosuchus lapparenti (included in the family Elosuchidae with Elosuchus), suggesting that without clear phylogenetic analysis, the creation of the Elosuchidae was premature. A preliminary phylogenetic analysis based on comparisons of D. phosphaticus with other dyrosaurids shows that Phosphatosaurus gavialoides and Sokotosuchus ianwilsoni are the most primitive dyrosaurids, and Rhabdognathus is more closely related to Hyposaurus than to D. phosphaticus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".