Nanoscale mechanical behavior of vanadium doped ZnO piezoelectric nanofiber by nanoindentation technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nanoscale mechanical behavior of Zn0.975V0.025O (V-ZnO) piezoelectric nanofibers by electrospinning was investigated using a nanoindenter in detail. After being calcined at 700 °C, V-ZnO nanofibers are of hexagonal wurtzite phase crystal structure, and the diameter and length are in the range of 50–300 nm and several tens to several hundreds of micrometers. The statistical average values of reduced modulus and hardness are 58.7±4.2 and 3.3±0.2 GPa for the nanofibers, and they decrease by 47.2% and 34.0% in comparison with those of bulk ZnO. It indicates that size effect of the mechanical behavior was obviously observed for the nanofibers, and the mechanism is discussed in conjunction with their high surface-to-volume ratio. Indentation depth-dependent reduced modulus and hardness properties were observed at indentation depth less than 18 nm, and it is attributed to the strain gradient effect during nanoindentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".