MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019802394 · doi:10.1002/art.10055

Nimesulide, a preferential cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor, suppresses peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor induction of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression in human synovial fibroblasts: Evidence for receptor antagonism

2002· article· en· W2019802394 on OpenAlexaff
Tanja Kalajdzic, Wissam H. Faour, Qing He, Hassan Fahmi, Johanne Martel‐Pelletier, Jean‐Pierre Pelletier, John A. Di Battista

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis & Rheumatism · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Institute for Materials Science
KeywordsTransactivationMolecular biologyPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptorReporter geneChemistryAgonistResponse elementElectrophoretic mobility shift assayTransfectionReceptorGene expressionBiologyPromoterBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the inhibitory effects of therapeutic concentrations of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug nimesulide (NIM) on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-induced cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) gene expression in human synovial fibroblasts (HSFs) from patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and to define the intracellular mechanisms mediating the response. METHODS: PPARalpha and PPARgamma messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and protein synthesis in OA HSFs were measured by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and electrophoretic mobility shift assay, respectively. Experiments investigating endogenous and overexpressed PPARalpha and PPARgamma activation of COX-2 mRNA and protein were conducted by incubating nontransfected and transfected cells with increasing concentrations of cognate ligands WY-14,643 (alpha agonist), ciglitasone (gamma agonist), and 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)) in the absence or presence of NIM and NS-398 (1 microM). COX-2 mRNA and protein were measured by Northern and Western blotting procedures, respectively. Receptor activation studies were evaluated by cotransfecting pSG5-Gal 4 DNA binding domain (DBD)-PPARalpha ligand binding domain (LBD) or pSG5-Gal 4 DBD-PPARgamma LBD chimeric constructs with a 5x Gal 4 enhancer site tk-tataa-luciferase reporter under ligand stimulation in the presence or absence of increasing concentrations of NIM. Gene transactivation analyses were conducted by treating cells overexpressing cytomegalovirus (CMV)-PPARalpha or CMV-PPARgamma expression constructs with either a PPAR response element (PPRE)-luciferase construct containing 3 DR1 acyl-coenzyme A (acyl-CoA) oxidase gene response elements or human COX-2 promoter constructs with WY-14,643, ciglitasone, and 15d-PGJ(2) in the presence or absence of increasing concentrations of NIM. RESULTS: Human synovial cells expressed functional PPAR isoforms, PPARalpha and PPARgamma. Neither receptor agonists nor antagonists modulated the intracellular protein levels of PPAR. PPARalpha and, especially, PPARgamma mediated the induction of COX-2 gene expression by receptor agonists. Stimulation of COX-2 mRNA expression and protein synthesis by 15d-PGJ(2) appeared to occur through a receptor-independent process. NIM inhibited PPAR agonist stimulation of COX-2 expression and synthesis in a dose-dependent manner in both nontransfected cells and cells overexpressing both receptor isoforms. NIM potently abrogated basal and ligand-stimulated PPRE(3X) DR1 acyl-CoA oxidase-driven luciferase activity and also human PPRE-containing COX-2 promoter activity. CONCLUSION: PPAR-mediated induction of COX-2 expression and synthesis in human OA synovial fibroblasts is inhibited by therapeutic concentrations of NIM through the functional antagonism of ligand-dependent receptor activation, with the resultant suppression of PPAR-dependent transactivation of target genes (e.g., COX-2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis & RheumatismSame topicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207