MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019828604 · doi:10.4244/eijv5i5a97

Impact of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors on renal function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention

2009· article· en· W2019828604 on OpenAlexaff
Azriel Osherov, Ariel Roguin, Doron Aronson, Ehud Grenadier, Arthur Kerner, Monther Boulus, Michael Kapeliovich, Hani Amad, Haim Hammerman, Rafael Beyar, Eugenia Nikolsky

Bibliographic record

VenueEuroIntervention · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarctionConventional PCIRenal functionCreatinineInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Worsening renal function in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. We hypothesised that platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) may decrease the rate of renal function deterioration in these patients through attenuation of platelet aggregation and the possible improvement of renal rheology and haemodynamics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on prospectively collected data, we analysed rates of renal function deterioration in 603 consecutive patients (mean age 58+/-13 years, males 82%) with STEMI treated with primary or rescue PCI. Renal function deterioration was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level of >or=25% and/or >or=0.5 mg/dl at any time point post-PCI during index hospitalisation compared with baseline value. Outcomes were stratified by treatment with GPI. Patients treated with GPI (n=442) vs. patients who were not treated with GPI (n=161) had significantly lower rates of serum creatinine increase of >or=25% compared with baseline (22.9% vs. 31.9%, P=0.02, respectively), of serum creatinine increase >or=0.5 g/dL (4.1% vs. 8.8%, P=0.02). Treatment with GPI was associated with significantly lower mean maximal increase in serum creatinine level compared with baseline value (0.14+/-0.38 vs. 0.25+/-0.45 mg/dL, P=0.005). Rates of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the two groups (7.3% vs. 5.9%; P=0.42), while 30-day mortality was significantly lower in patients treated with GPI (2.3% vs. 7.5%; P=0.005). By multivariable analysis, treatment with GPI was an independent predictor of freedom from renal function deterioration (odds ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.86; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, administration of GPI to patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI was associated with lower rates of worsening renal function and lower 30-day mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuroInterventionSame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207