Vasoconstrictor Effect and Mechanism of Action of Endothelin-1 in Human Radial Artery and Vein: Implication of Skin Flap Vasospasm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vasospasm in the vascular pedicle is a major cause of ischemic necrosis in autogenous skin transplantation (i.e., skin free flap surgery), and the pathophysiology is unclear. The clinical impression is that veins are more susceptible to vasospasm than arteries in the vascular pedicle of skin free flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare the vasoconstrictor response of the human radial artery (RA) and radial vein (RV) to endothelin (ET)-1 and to investigate the mechanism mediating ET-1-induced vasoconstriction. The isometric tension of RA and RV rings (4 mm) obtained from the vascular pedicle of human radial forearm skin free flaps were studied in organ chambers containing Krebs bicarbonate buffer. It was observed that ET-1 elicited concentration-dependent (5 x 10 (-11)to 2 x 10 (-8) ) contractions in RA and RV rings with similar contractile potency. However, the concentration-dependent contractile response to ET-1 was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in RV rings than in RA rings, with the maximum contractile response twice as high in RV rings than in RA rings. The contractile response to ET-1 in RA and RV rings was blocked by the ET receptor antagonist BQ 123 (10 (-5M)), but not by the ET receptor antagonist BQ 788 (5 x 10 (-6)). The ET(B) receptor agonist BQ 3020 (10 (-10) to 2 x 10(-8) ) had no significant contractile effect in RA and RV rings. Furthermore, the L-type Ca channel antagonist nifedipine (5 x 10 (-6)), the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor chelerythrine (10(-5M)), and the intracellular Ca chelator BAPTA-AM (10(-5M)) significantly reduced the contractile potency of ET-1 in RA rings and the maximum contractile response to ET-1 in RA and RV rings. It was concluded that the human RV is more responsive than RA to the contractile effect of ET-1. The contractile response to ET-1 in RA and RV is predominantly mediated by ET(A) receptors and the postreceptor mechanism involves L-type Ca (2+) channels, PKC, and intracellular Ca(2+).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".