Differential Anti-Golgi Complex Autoantibody Production Following Murine Lactate Dehydrogenase-Elevating Virus Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV) causes asymptomatic infection and persistent viremia in mice with unique infectious specificity directed to a certain subpopulation of macrophages leading to chronic infection and an immunological disorder that includes hyperimmunoglobulinemia and production of autoantibodies. Infection with a species of LDV originally isolated from mice carrying an LDV-contaminated transplantable tumor (LDV-W) was reported to induce anti-Golgi complex antibody (AGA) production. In contrast, infection with the most common LDV species (LDV-P) was not associated with AGA production. Here we performed the first independent side by side comparison of the effects of the two LDV strains on their hosts as an initial approach to investigating the production of AGA. After viral inoculation, both LDV-W and LDV-P infected mice exhibited similar changes in lactate dehydrogenase in plasma suggesting similar viral activity. However, AGA production was observed in only the LDV-W infected mice and these mice exhibited plasma IgG elevation and immune complex formation. These data validated the differential potential of LDV-W and LDV-P in the production of AGA. Future comparative characterizations in the immune processing of Golgi complex autoantigens using these viral strains may be useful in obtaining specific insights in the specific anti-Golgi complex autoimmune responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".