Coherent population trapping in photonic and dispersive band-gap materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A theory of coherent population trapping (CPT) has been developed in photonic band-gap (PBG) and dispersive polaritonic band-gap (DPBG) materials when doped with an ensemble of five-level atoms. These materials have gaps in their photon energy spectra leading to unusual optical properties. The atoms are prepared as coherent superpositions of the two lower states and interact with a reservoir and two photon fields. The transition between the two lower states of an atom is dipole forbidden. The Schrödinger equation and the Laplace transform method are used to calculate the expressions for the number densities of the atomic states. Numerical simulations are performed for both PBG and DPBG materials with the phase factor between the coherent states chosen such that the number density of the upper state becomes zero when the photon fields have the same intensity. It is found that when the resonance energies lie away from the band edges and within the lower band, the CPT effect is observed in both materials when the fields have identical intensities. Similar results are also found when the resonance energies lie away from the band edges and within the upper band. When one of the resonance energies lies near the lower band edge, the number density vanishes at all intensities of the fields for both materials. This is an effect of the band structure of the materials and is not due to the CPT effect. A similar result is seen when one of the resonance energies lies near the upper band edge of a PBG material. However, for a DPBG material, the number density does not become zero when one of the resonance energies lies near the upper band edge, except due to the CPT effect brought on by the identical intensities of the photon fields. This is a very interesting phenomenon. Acknowledgments MRS is thankful to NSERC of Canada for financial support in the form of a research grant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it