MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019887136 · doi:10.1055/s-0029-1213984

Bevacizumab in Kombination mit Cisplatin/Gemcitabin versus Cisplatin/Gemcitabin als Erstlinientherapie bei Patienten mit fortgeschrittenem nichtsquamösen nichtkleinzelligen Lungenkarzinom (NSCLC): eine randomisierte Phase III Studie (AVAiL)

2009· article· de· W2019887136 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Reck, Joachim von Pawel, Petr Zatloukal, Rodryg Ramlau, V. Gorbounova, Vera Hirsh, Natasha B. Leighl, J. Mezger, Venice Archer, C. Manegold

Bibliographic record

VenuePneumologie · 2009
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBevacizumabCarboplatinCisplatinPaclitaxelGynecologyOncologyChemotherapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale: Die Kombination von Bevacizumab (Bev) mit Carboplatin/Paclitaxel führte in der E4599 Studie zu einer signifikanten Verlängerung der Progressionsfreien- und Gesamtüberlebenszeit. In der AVAIL Studie wurde die Kombination von Bev mit CG bei Patienten mit NSCLC untersucht

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePneumologieSame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207