MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2020009315 · doi:10.1139/v04-084

Gaussian basis sets for low-lying excited states of neutral atoms with 2 ≤ <i>Z</i> ≤ 36

2004· article· en· W2020009315 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M.T. Barreto, A. Canal Neto, F.E. Jorge

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal do Espírito SantoUniversidade Estadual PaulistaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsSTO-nG basis setsExcited stateChemistryAtomic physicsGaussianBasis (linear algebra)ExcitationHartree–Fock methodAtomic orbitalMolecular orbitalBasis setBond-dissociation energyDissociation (chemistry)Linear combination of atomic orbitalsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsElectronComputational chemistryMoleculeDensity functional theoryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The improved generator coordinate Hartree–Fock method is used to generate Gaussian basis sets for low-lying excited states of neutral atoms from He (Z = 2) to Kr (Z = 36). Then, excitation energies and orbital energies of the outermost orbitals of each symmetry are calculated and compared with the corresponding values obtained with numerical Hartree–Fock calculations. Besides this, the basis sets for Be (3P) and F (2P) are contracted by a standard procedure and, then, enriched with polarization functions. From these basis sets, total energies, dissociation energy, and bond length for BeF are calculated and compared with results obtained with other basis sets and with experimental values. The sets for He–Kr are useful in constructing basis sets for molecular calculations. Key words: improved generator coordinate Hartree–Fock method, Gaussian basis sets, low-lying excited states, neutral atoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Chemistry→Same topicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies→French-language works237,207→