Early generation performance of Fragaria species hybrids in crosses with cultivated strawberry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yield (i.e., fruit number and size) and yield component measurements were collected and destructive growth analysis carried out on lower-ploidy Fragaria species, synthetic octoploids (SO), F 1 (SO × cultivar), OC 1 (F 1 × cultivar) hybrids and cultivars. Plants were grown in two field trials, at the Elora Research Station, Ontario, and at the Wye Research and Education Centre, Queenstown, Maryland, and in one greenhouse trial in Guelph, Ontario. Total plant dry weight (PDW) was highly variable for the species, but the higher vegetative vigour of the SOs compared with mid-parent values suggested a heterotic effect. The shade adapted species (e.g., F. moschata Duch. and F. nubicola) had greater PDWs than the sun adapted species. Yields of the species, SOs and F 1 hybrids were low; however, flower number was higher compared with cultivars. The first outcross with F 1 s and cultivars resulted in a sixfold increase in yield attributed to both increased fruit size and fruit number. Three of the four OC 1 hybrids had yields that were comparable with cultivars. Through breeding and intensive selection, genotypes introgressed with SO germplasm can be restored to the pre-cultivar yield levels with only a few outcrosses to the cultivated strawberry.Key words: Growth analysis, heterosis, interspecific hybridization, strawberry, yield, synthetic octoploid
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".