An anesthesiologist's guide to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: implications for managing single-lung anesthesia and atelectasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is the pulmonary circulation's homeostatic mechanism for matching regional perfusion to ventilation and optimizing systemic PaO2. The role of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in anesthesiology is reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: In hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, airway hypoxia causes resistance pulmonary arteries to constrict, diverting blood to better-oxygenated alveoli. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction optimizes O2 uptake in atelectasis, pneumonia, asthma, and adult respiratory distress syndrome. During single-lung anesthesia, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction helps maintain systemic oxygenation. When hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is weak, systemic hypoxemia is exacerbated. Although not widely used, the peripheral chemoreceptor agonist almitrine enhances hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and improves PaO2 during single-lung anesthesia. The mechanism of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction involves a redox-based O2 sensor within pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. Pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells mitochondria vary production of reactive O2 species in proportion to PaO2. Hypoxic withdrawal of these redox second messengers inhibits voltage-gated potassium channels, depolarizing the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. Depolarization activates L-type calcium channels, increasing cytosolic calcium and triggering hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. SUMMARY: An understanding of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is clinically relevant for anesthesiologists. Randomized clinical trials with robust endpoints are required to assess strategies for enhancing hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in thoracic surgery patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".