Impacts of climate change on the frequency and severity of floods in the Châteauguay River basin, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims at evaluating the hydrologic impacts of climate change on the Châteauguay River basin in the province of Quebec, Canada. Three global climate models (GCMs) covering a range of climate sensitivities were selected, and their output was employed to adjust the parameters of a stochastic weather generator using simple transformation rules for precipitation and temperature. Values of monthly precipitation and temperature were extracted from the GCMs for the current (1960–1990) and future (2040–2060) climate. The International Panel on Climate Change emission scenario known as B2 was selected. It represents an average scenario and corresponds approximately to a doubling of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration. Resorting to stochastically generated climate scenarios allowed assessing whether the modelled effects of climate change on flows were statistically significant. Results indicate that spring and summer–fall peak flows were reduced on average by 30% and 12%, respectively, using the Echam4 model derived scenarios. The Hadcm3 model produced a weaker signal that was not statistically significant. The CGCM2 model produced a statistically significant reduction in spring peak flows of 8% on average, whereas the simulated reduction in summer flows was not statistically significant for many of the return periods considered. Many sources of uncertainties were partially considered in this study. One is the downscaling of the GCM climatology at the watershed scale. The approach employed to generate the future climate scenarios changed the precipitation variability through an adjustment of the parameters of the Gamma distribution function used to model precipitation amounts. Whether this approach is truly typical of climate change effect remains to be ascertained. Using more physically based hydrological models would help reduce uncertainties in climate change impacts studies.Key words: climate change, weather generator, flood, frequency analysis, hydrological modelling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".