MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020124125 · doi:10.1002/apj.185

Electrical transport properties of aliovalent cation‐doped CeO<sub>2</sub>

2008· article· en· W2020124125 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPowder diffractionIonic radiusDopantAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceIonic conductivityDopingElectrical resistivity and conductivityCeramicAtmospheric temperature rangeInorganic chemistryIonChemistryCrystallographyPhysical chemistryMetallurgyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the comparative electrical properties of monovalent (Na + ), divalent (Ca 2+ , Sr 2+ ), trivalent (In 3+ , La 3+ ) and coupled substitution of divalent and trivalent (Ca 2+ + Sm 3+ ) cation‐doped CeO 2 . The investigated samples were prepared by solid‐state reaction (ceramic) using the corresponding metal oxides and salts in the temperature range 1000–1600 °C in air. Powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD), laser particle size analysis (LPSA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and ac impedance spectroscopy measurements were employed for structural, morphology, and electrical characterization. PXRD studies reveal the formation of single‐phase cubic fluorite‐type structures for all investigated samples except those doped with In 3+ . The variation of lattice parameters is consistent with ionic radii (IR) of the dopant metal ions, with the exception of Na + ‐doped CeO 2 . Our attempt to substitute In 3+ for Ce 4+ in CeO 2 using both ceramic and wet chemical methods was unsuccessful. Furthermore, diffraction peaks attributed to CeO 2 and In 2 O 3 were observed up to sintering conditions of 1600 °C. Among the single‐phase compounds investigated, Ce 0.85 Ca 0.05 Sm 0.1 O 1.9 exhibits the highest bulk conductivity of 1.3 × 10 −3 S/cm at 500 °C with activation energy of 0.64 eV in air. The electrical conductivity data obtained for Ce 0.85 Ca 0.05 Sm 0.1 O 1.9 in air and Ar were found to be very similar over the investigated temperature range, indicating the absence of p‐electronic conduction in the high oxygen partial pressure (pO 2 ) range which is consistent with literature reported on Sm‐doped CeO 2 . Copyright © 2008 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it