Bone Morphogenetic Protein Excipients: Comparative Observations on Poloxamer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinicians await the availability of synthetic bioimplants that will replace the need for autogeneic bone grafts in bone reconstructive surgery. For more than a decade, researchers have evaluated delivery vehicles for the tissue morphogen bone morphogenetic protein. The object of this investigation was to measure induced bone development when bone morphogenetic protein was delivered by human tendon collagen, human demineralized bone matrix, hydroxyapatite, a composite of human tendon collagen and human demineralized bone matrix (tendon collagen + demineralized bone matrix), Poloxamer 407, and a composite of human demineralized bone matrix and Poloxamer 407. Sixty-three adult male Swiss Webster mice (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, Ind.) received 126 implants. The animals were divided into seven groups of nine animals, depending on carrier (six carriers plus the positive control group) used. Each animal received a bone morphogenetic protein-enhanced carrier in one hindquarter muscle mass, with the contralateral leg being implanted with the carrier alone. Implants were evaluated by quantitative radiomorphometry validated by histologic methods. Radiographically, no significant differences were identified among any of the implants evaluated (p > 0.05). Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that Poloxamer 407 was significantly (p < 0.05) better at delivering bone morphogenetic protein than the other carriers involved in this investigation. The new bone developed in a tubular or spherical shape. Interaction of endogenous and exogenous delivery systems seems to be essential for optimal transmission of bone morphogenetic protein. The importance of the excipient to deliver bone morphogenetic protein and develop a bone morphogenetic protein concentration gradient has been emphasized by other investigators and confirmed by our research on poloxamer. With further research on the physicochemical mechanisms of localization and transmission of bone morphogenetic protein, it may be possible to avoid hazardous operations with autogeneic bone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".