Pyridine−<i>tert</i>-Nitrogen−Phenol Ligands: N,N,O-Type Tripodal Chelates for the [M(CO)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>+</sup> Core (M = Re, Tc)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The design rationale, synthesis, and preliminary radiolabeling evaluation of new N,N,O-type pyridyl- tert-nitrogen-phenol ligands for the [M(CO) 3] (+) core, where M = (99m)Tc or Re, are described. The capability of the ligands to bind this technetium core is initially demonstrated by using the cold surrogate [Re(CO) 3] (+). NMR studies of the relevant rhenium tricarbonyl complexes indicate the formation of either a monomeric or a possible dimeric complex with each phenolic O atom bridging between two metal centers. Labeling with [ (99m)Tc(CO) 3] (+) provided further insight into the differences in complex formation on the dilute, no carrier added, level compared to the macroscopic scale at which the Re (I) counterparts were made. These new tridentate, monoanionic ligands are competent chelates in binding the [ (99m)Tc(CO) 3] (+) core because radiolabeling yields ranged from 85 to 99% and the resulting complexes were stable to cysteine and histidine challenges for as long as 24 h.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".