Disruption of the Dopamine D2 Receptor Impairs Insulin Secretion and Causes Glucose Intolerance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationship between antidopaminergic drugs and glucose has not been extensively studied, even though chronic neuroleptic treatment causes hyperinsulinemia in normal subjects or is associated with diabetes in psychiatric patients. We sought to evaluate dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) participation in pancreatic function. Glucose homeostasis was studied in D2R knockout mice (Drd2(-/-)) mice and in isolated islets from wild-type and Drd2(-/-) mice, using different pharmacological tools. Pancreas immunohistochemistry was performed. Drd2(-/-) male mice exhibited an impairment of insulin response to glucose and high fasting glucose levels and were glucose intolerant. Glucose intolerance resulted from a blunted insulin secretory response, rather than insulin resistance, as shown by glucose-stimulated insulin secretion tests (GSIS) in vivo and in vitro and by a conserved insulin tolerance test in vivo. On the other hand, short-term treatment with cabergoline, a dopamine agonist, resulted in glucose intolerance and decreased insulin response to glucose in wild-type but not in Drd2(-/-) mice; this effect was partially prevented by haloperidol, a D2R antagonist. In vitro results indicated that GSIS was impaired in islets from Drd2(-/-) mice and that only in wild-type islets did dopamine inhibit GSIS, an effect that was blocked by a D2R but not a D1R antagonist. Finally, immunohistochemistry showed a diminished pancreatic beta-cell mass in Drd2(-/-) mice and decreased beta-cell replication in 2-month-old Drd2(-/-) mice. Pancreatic D2Rs inhibit glucose-stimulated insulin release. Lack of dopaminergic inhibition throughout development may exert a gradual deteriorating effect on insulin homeostasis, so that eventually glucose intolerance develops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".