MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020321939 · doi:10.1080/15505170.2014.966930

Cinema and Pedagogy: An Urban Education Seminar

2014· article· en· W2020321939 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Meyer, Al-Munir Vellani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Pedagogy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterNothingnobodySociologySpellArt historyMedia studiesArtAestheticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alfredo: Living here day by day, you think it's the center of the world. You believe nothing will ever change. Then you leave: a year, two years. When you come back, everything's changed, the threads broken. What you came to find isn't there. What was yours is gone. You have to go away for a long time … many years … before you can come back and find your people—the land where you were born. But now, no. It's not possible. Right now you’re blinder than I am.Salvatore: Who said that? Gary Cooper? James Stewart? Henry Fonda? Eh?Alfredo: No, Toto. Nobody said it. This time it's all me. Life isn't like in the movies. Life … is much harder.In Cinema Paradiso (Tomatore, 1988), Salvatore's love of movies came from spending his earlier, young life inside a cinema with the fatherly projectionist Alfredo, now blind and bitter. Alfredo is right. Life is much harder, yes, yet still very much “like in the movies” filled with frustrated actions, performed inside blind and repetitive constellations of every-day-ness and non-stop antinomies. Cinema Paradiso, among other cinematic gems, is curriculum to a seminar in Urban Education that probes, tussles, even attempts to seduce the grand problem of education, as posed by Hannah Arendt: “[F]or the sake of what is new and revolutionary in every child, education must … preserve this newness and introduce it as a new thing into an old world” (1968, p. 193). In this essay the authors, characters themselves and co-instructors, tell the story of this seminar and its pedagogy. In the telling, each plays a different role—Meyer recounts the narrative in seven scenes, Vellani weaves in five Counterpoint Moments of its hermeneutics, set up as notes between the scenes. The narrative feature, Matinee Dreams, unfolds an argument in prose, of lived curricular and cinematic moments with teachers from urban contexts—graduate students, at times a weeping audience, and co-authors in children's lives. In front of the screen in a makeshift cinema, all are beholden to the Arendtian question of pedagogy: What does it mean to be a teacher amid the onslaught of newcomers and the unpredictable plurality, in a world, old and weary?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and PedagogySame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207