MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020438708 · doi:10.3892/ijmm.8.6.611

Molecular cloning and characterization of LZIC, a novel gene encoding ICAT homologous protein with leucine zipper domain

2001· article· en· W2020438708 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Masaru Katoh

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFoundation for Promotion of Cancer ResearchCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
KeywordsLeucine zipperBiologyGeneWnt signaling pathwayGeneticsMolecular biologyTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ICAT inhibits the interaction between beta-catenin and TCF transcription factors. As ICAT might be a tumor suppressor gene with the potential to negatively regulate the WNT - beta-catenin - TCF signaling pathway, ICAT related gene in the human genome draft sequence was searched for. Here, the LZIC gene, a novel gene encoding a 190-amino-acid polypeptide with leucine zipper domain and ICAT homologous domain, was cloned and characterized. Amino-acid identity between LZIC and ICAT in the ICAT homologous domain was 38%. The LZIC gene, consisting of at least 8 exons, was located in the human chromosome 1p36.32-pter region. The major 5.2-kb LZIC mRNA and minor 2.1-, 1.6-, and 1.0-kb LZIC mRNAs were expressed almost ubiquitously in normal human tissues. LZIC was expressed in all cancer cell lines examined in this study, and was significantly up-regulated in a gastric cancer cell line MKN74 and 5 cases of primary gastric cancer. As LZIC contains ICAT homologous domain, LZIC might inhibit the interaction between beta-catenin and TCF transcription factors, just like ICAT, and, up-regulation of LZIC in gastric cancer might be due to a negative feed-back mechanism to inhibit the WNT - beta-catenin - TCF signaling pathway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular MedicineSame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207